Using information management tools in university libraries, effect on scientific activity: Case study
Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia, ISSN: 2538-9866, Vol: 42, Issue: 2, Page: 141-157
2019
- 1Citations
- 656Usage
- 63Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article aims to show the results of the implementation of tools for information management of the Library of the University of Sancti Spíritus "José Martí Pérez" and the effect that had on the scientific production of the same, measured in their fundamentals. For this descriptive research linking qualitative and quantitative methods, tools, techniques and seeks to identify the characteristic behavior in the scientific production of the university from management tools selected for this information are made. The main results were integrated into four groups: analysis of audit information; analysis of information literacy program; analysis of the effect of changes in information management library, as a case study in scientific output indicators; reflections on the overall results. The most important conclusion is evident the need to include these tools of information management in a continuous cycle in the university library, for information management requires ongoing review for sustained effect on indicators of substantive processes university.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067096073&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v42n2a03; https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/RIB/article/view/334158; http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/RIB/article/viewFile/334158/20793516; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-09762019000200141&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-09762019000200141&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-09762019000200141; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-09762019000200141; https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v42n2a03
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know