Publications Analyzing the Scientific Production on Open Science in Latin America: A Bibliographic Survey
Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia, ISSN: 2538-9866, Vol: 47, Issue: 3
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The initiatives and practices that constitute the Open Science Movement have contributed to transparency and access to scientific information. In Latin America, they are essential to the structuring and visibility of scientific production originating in the region. In this context, this research analyzes publications on Latin American scientific production on open science. The bibliographic survey, carried out in nine databases, resulted in the identification of 41 documents. These were grouped into three categories, according to the similarity of approaches: a) Applications and practices of open science (60.97%), b) Theoretical-reflective writings on open science (29.26%) and c) Metric studies of scientific production on open science (9.75%). The results indicate that the use of the term “open science” is recent, with productions dating back to the last 10 years and mainly associated with the dissemination of practices and development of resources within the movement. Metric studies on the topic are still incipient, with analyzes that involve multiple methodological possibilities, the variation of information sources, geographic and/or chronological sections and the variety of terminologies that make up the Open Science movement. The thematic breadth of the Open Science movement and the coverage of the data sources used, commonly with little representation of Latin American production, are among the limitations of this type of analysis.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know