Generalised Factors of Creative Thinking in the Context of Diversity of Subjects’ Socio-Cultural Identity
Social Psychology and Society, ISSN: 2311-7052, Vol: 16, Issue: 1, Page: 28-50
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective. To differentiate subjects into types according to differences in the creative thinking factor structure and to identify typological variants of integration of creative thinking properties and various components of sociocultural identity. Background. Based on the identified tendencies of integrative creativity researches the direction of its study is outlined: from the definition of generalized factors of creative thinking and creative personality to the identification of different creator types, with different ratio of general cognitive and personal components determining their specific resources, achievement opportunities in various socio-cultural contexts. Participants. 162 students of different specialties, ages from 18 to 22 (M = 19,5; 97 females, 65 males). Measurements. Figural Test for Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, psychodiagnostic technology “Role Relations between Social Subjects and Creative Personalities” by V.G. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya et al., based on repertory grids method by J. Kelly. Results. A two-factor creative thinking structure was confirmed, including innovational (fluency, flexibility, originality) and adaptational (elaboration, abstractness of titles) factors. Based on the ratio differences between innovational and adaptational factors, subjects were differentiated into four types: innovational, adaptational, high-creative, low-creative. The ratio peculiarities between the factors of creative thinking and sociocultural identity, including social role and value components, in subjects of different types was revealed. Conclusions. Creative subject types, differentiated by ratio of innovational and adaptational factors of creative thinking, have been revealed. The specific peculiarities in creativity integrative structures of the revealed types of subjects are identified. The typological variants of integration of creative thinking properties and various components of sociocultural identity have been revealed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know