Investigating Injection Pressure as a Predictor to Enhance Real-Time Forecasting of Fluid-Induced Seismicity: A Bayesian Model Comparison
Seismological Research Letters, ISSN: 1938-2057, Vol: 94, Issue: 2 A, Page: 708-719
2023
- 4Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Fluid-induced seismicity is now a growing concern in the spotlight and managing its risks entails a probabilistic forecast model suited to real-time applications, which commonly relies on the operational parameter of injection rate in a nonhomogeneous Poisson process. However, due to potential injectivity change, gas kicks, and other processes, injection rate may not provide as robust a proxy for the forcing process as injection pressure, which embodies fluid-rock interactions. Hence, we present a Bayesian approach to prospective model comparison with parameter uncertainties considered. We tested nine geothermal stimulation case studies to comprehensively demonstrate that injection pressure is indeed the main physical predictor of induced seismicity relative to injection rate, and when combined with the latter as predictors, can give the best-performing model and robustly enhance real-time probabilistic forecasting of induced seismicity. We also discussed the implications of our results for seismic risk management and potential directions for further model improvement.
Bibliographic Details
Seismological Society of America (SSA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know