The significance of screening questionnaire in the evaluation of age-related macular risk degeneration development
Oftalmologiya, ISSN: 2500-0845, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 501-507
2019
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Aim: to evaluate the diagnostic value and objectification of the STARS questionnaire in the evaluation of risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) development. Patients and methods. 104 patients (206 eyes) 40 males (32.3 %), 84 women (67.7 %), who filled the self-administered STARS screening questionnaire, were enrolled in the study. All patients were referred without suspicion or established diagnosis of AMD of any other retinal pathology. Optical coherent tomography (OCT) and macular pigment optical density (MPOD) were carried out in order to objectify questionnaire score points and retinal structural changes. Results. The significant difference was found between patient without AMD and those with newly established AMD diagnosis not only in questionnaire score but also in some structural changes indicators: mean retinal thickness, foveal retinal thickness by OCT (<0.05). The direct correlation between increase in questionnaire points and estimate AMD stage by AREDS was found as well as the direct correlation between questionnaire score points and risk of AMD development, newly established AMD diagnosis, maximal macular pigment optical density (MPOD), mean macular pigment optical density and central retinal thickness. The area under ROC-curve was 0.62. Conclusion. STARS is a new, simple, self-administered questionnaire which accurately distinguishes AMD development and progression risk groups and can be recommended for routine use in every day practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082824231&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2019-4-501-507; https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/1084; https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/viewFile/1084/653; https://dx.doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2019-4-501-507
PE Polunina Elizareta Gennadievna
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know