Predicting Intimate Partner Violence Recidivism using the Swedish Prison and Probation Service’s Risk-Need-Responsivity Assessment (RNR-A)
Nordic Journal of Criminology, ISSN: 2578-9821, Vol: 24, Issue: 1, Page: 1-20
2023
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
The Swedish Prison and Probation Service (SPPS) provides risk-reducing interventions tailored to clients’ recidivism risk, with the intake assessment RNR-A informing sentence plans. This study tested the predictive utility of the RNR-A in a cohort of 3,145 clients (M = 39 years, 2% women) convicted of intimate partner violence (IPV). During 24 months of follow-up, IPV reconvictions (10% overall) increased significantly with each increase in risk level (low, medium, high). Discrimination performance was comparable to similar instruments (AUC range = .59–.68). A high proportion of IPV recidivists were classified as medium-to-high risk (sensitivity range = 87–95%) at the cost of over-inclusion of non-recidivists in these risk levels (specificity range = 13–27%). This study contributes to broader efforts to evaluate the implementation of Bonta and Andrews’ (2017) risk principle in the SPPS and supports the use of the RNR-A to screen out those clients with the least need of IPV-specific intervention. Further instrument development and calibration in combination with the use of in-depth assessments for complex medium-to-high risk cases may increase the potential of effective service delivery, providing intensive and extensive services to clients with the greatest risk and needs.
Bibliographic Details
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know