Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego, sygn. akt I CSK 138/08
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, ISSN: 0208-6069, Vol: 82, Issue: 1, Page: 115-124
2018
- 9Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage9
- Downloads7
- Abstract Views2
Article Description
This article is a commentary on the court decisions made in connection with the factual situation regarding the admission of a patient to a psychiatric hospital without their consent. In relation to the circumstances found in the case, conditions determining the acceptability of admission to a psychiatric hospital with no consent were discussed under legal regulations contained in art. 23 and 24 of the mental health act. The publication presented arguments for the rightness of providing people with healthcare services, in some circumstances without their consent.
Bibliographic Details
https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/Iuridica/article/view/3178; http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.82.10; https://digijournals.uni.lodz.pl/aul_foliaiuridica/vol82/iss1/10; https://digijournals.uni.lodz.pl/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1123&context=aul_foliaiuridica; https://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.82.10
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know