Markierung von Kohärenzrelationen in Sachtexten – Auswirkung auf das Leseverstehen von Schülern
Convivium (Poland), ISSN: 2657-6252, Vol: 2011, Issue: 1, Page: 389-412
2011
- 1Citations
- 49Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage49
- Downloads42
- Abstract Views7
Article Description
Reading comprehension is a complex process, characterized by a reciprocal dependence of a text and its recipient. The acquisition of coherence relations is important for understanding of the text. These relations can be explicitly marked or can be present implicitly at text level. The article deals with an empirical study that examines the effect of coherence relations on reading comprehension of fourth- and sixth-graders. The used text materials are expository texts. The results show that only potentially better readers benefit partially of the explicite markers, while no significant effect occurs on poor readers.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127759442&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2196-8403.2011.18; https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/conv/article/view/8837; https://digijournals.uni.lodz.pl/convivium/vol2011/iss1/18; https://digijournals.uni.lodz.pl/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1132&context=convivium; https://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2196-8403.2011.18
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know