Combined use of biomarkers and in situ bioassays in Daphnia magna to monitor environmental hazards of pesticides in the field
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, ISSN: 0730-7268, Vol: 26, Issue: 2, Page: 370-379
2007
- 97Citations
- 116Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations97
- Citation Indexes97
- 97
- CrossRef94
- Captures116
- Readers116
- 116
Article Description
The aim of this investigation was to evaluate toxicity effects of pesticides in aquatic invertebrates using in situ bioassays with the local species, Daphnia magna. Investigations were carried out in the Delta del Ebro (northeast Spain) during the main growing season of rice (May-August). Measures of energy consumption (i.e., algal grazing) and of specific biochemical responses (biomarkers) were conducted in individuals transplanted at four stations, including a clean site upstream of the affected area and the three main channels that collect and drain the water from the rice fields into the sea. Seventeen pesticides were analyzed in water by on-line solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The results obtained indicated high levels of pesticides in water, with peak values of 487 μg/L for bentazone, 8 μg/L for methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, 5 μg/L for propanil, 0.8 μg/L for molinate, and 0.7 μg/L for fenitrothion. Measured biological responses denoted severe effects on grazing rates; a strong inhibition of cholinesterases and carboxylesterases, which are specific biomarkers of organophosphorous and carbamate pesticides; and altered patterns of the antioxidant enzyme catalase and the phase II metabolizing enzyme glutathione S-transferase. Correlation analysis with pesticide residue levels converted to toxic units relative to its acute 48-h median lethal concentration of D. magna indicated significant and negative coefficients between the dominant pesticide residues and the observed biological response, thus denoting a clear cause-and-effect relationship. The results emphasize the importance of considering specific (biomarkers) as well as more generalized and ecologically related (grazing) in situ responses to identify and evaluate biological effects of environmental contaminants in the field. © 2007 SETAC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33846681038&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/06-209r.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17713226; https://academic.oup.com/etc/article/26/2/370/7763438; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1897/06-209R.1; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1897%2F06-209R.1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1897/06-209r.1; https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1897/06-209R.1
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know