The Political Economy of Trade Barriers in Peru
Apuntes del Cenes, ISSN: 2256-5779, Vol: 41, Issue: 74, Page: 71-107
2022
- 2Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper analyzes the political economy factors and actors that may have influenced trade instruments in Peru during the liberalization period of 2001-2015 (which started in 1990 under Fujimori’s administration). The evidence supports the hypothesis that Peruvian trade barriers liberalization in period 2000-2015 was led by the “Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF)”, accompanied by traditional and diversified exporters (that consolidated the unilateral trade liberalization) and by import substitution firms that influenced to some degree, and slowed down the rate of liberalization of unilateral trade barriers. In addition, the unilateral trade liberalization was facilitated by the weak role of the formal labor force and liberal-oriented consumer interest groups.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144988834&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v41.n74.2022.13961; https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/article/view/13961; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-30532022000200071&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-30532022000200071&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-30532022000200071; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-30532022000200071; https://dx.doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v41.n74.2022.13961
Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know