Can the very thought of education break bricks? A Commentary on Biesta and Säfström’s ‘A Manifesto for Education’
Praxis Educativa, ISSN: 0328-9702, Vol: 22, Issue: 2, Page: 47-57
2018
- 59Usage
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
El presente texto intenta reflexionar sobre la potencialidad misma del pensamiento de educación en lo que refiere a la resignificación de esquemas a partir de la lectura de "Un Manifiesto para la educación". Dicho manifiesto puede ser entendido como una idealidad adolescente, la cual no sólo comienza, sino también siempre finalizará en desilusión -en este mal de la idealidad. La idealidad que persigue todo manifiesto puede conllevar a la inmovilidad y a la decepción, sin siquiera intentar romper esquemas estructurantes. El artículo que se presenta intentará abordar dicha cuestión a partir de nuestros propios pensamientos respecto a la crítica de la idealidad y de las reflexiones que invita a realizar el manifiesto en cuestión. De alguna manera nos otorga la posibilidad pensar y pensarnos educativamente. ¿Pero qué significa eso exactamente? Para alcanzar el significado del pensar lo educativo necesitamos considerar qué está implícito al sostener "lo que es" y "lo que no es" en tensión. De ello se abocará el último apartado del trabajo.
Bibliographic Details
https://cerac.unlpam.edu.ar/index.php/praxis/article/download/2679/2566; http://dx.doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2018-220206; http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0328-97022018000200006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0328-97022018000200006&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0328-97022018000200006; http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0328-97022018000200006; https://dx.doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2018-220206
Universidad Nacional de La Pampa
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know