The use of biological approaches in the treatment of shoulder pathology a critical analysis review
JBJS Reviews, ISSN: 2329-9185, Vol: 5, Issue: 9, Page: e5
2017
- 5Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Review Description
The major pathological conditions affecting the shoulder that are treated with use of biological applications include focal cartilage lesions and rotator cuff tears. Biological modalities that previously have been used or investigated include platelet-rich plasma (PRP), growth factors, progenitor cells, bone-marrow stimulation, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), matrix-induced ACI (MACI), and biological scaffolds.» Marrow-stimulating procedures have been reported to yield positive results when used for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions of the glenoid or humeral head. Limited data are available on the use of PRP, ACI, and MACI for the treatment of chondral lesions involving the shoulder, and therefore no conclusions can be drawn regarding the efficacy of these modalities.» Preclinical and in vitro studies have demonstrated that modulation of growth factors may be helpful for rotator cuff tear healing; however, the optimal modulation and delivery vehicle remain to be elucidated. PRP has received much research attention; however, most studies have been hindered by study setup and conflicting results. Therefore, the use of PRP to enhance rotator cuff healing remains controversial. Progenitor cells have shown positive results in a small number of preclinical and clinical studies, but further research is needed before conclusions can be drawn.» In summary, basic-science studies investigating biological factors to enhance healing in the shoulder have shown potential. However, clinical data are still limited, contradictory, and controversial. Additional research is needed. Most importantly, robust, consistent, well-powered clinical trials are necessary to definitively determine which methods improve clinical outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85032654669&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00035; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937418; https://journals.lww.com/01874474-201709000-00004; http://Insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01874474-201709000-00004; https://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00035; https://journals.lww.com/jbjsreviews/Abstract/2017/09000/The_Use_of_Biological_Approaches_in_the_Treatment.4.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know