Improving Operating Room Efficiency, Part 2: Intraoperative and Postoperative Strategies
JBJS Reviews, ISSN: 2329-9185, Vol: 3, Issue: 10, Page: 1-10
2015
- 14Citations
- 91Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- CrossRef14
- 13
- Captures91
- Readers91
- 42
- 39
- 10
Review Description
« Ankle syndesmotic injuries are common with or without malleolar ankle fractures. » The ankle syndesmosis is made of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, inferior transverse ligament, and interosseous ligament. « Normal syndesmosis widening can be up to 1.5 mm. » The syndesmosis helps to prevent excessive fibular motion during locomotion. « Clinical examinations to diagnose a syndesmotic injury are inaccurate. » Initial injury and intraoperative stress radiographs help to confirm the diagnosis. « Effective treatment requires accurate reduction and stable fixation allowing syndesmotic ankle ligament healing, limited syndesmotic motion, and restoration of stable ankle mechanics. » Nonoperative treatment for isolated syndesmotic injury is appropriate in a majority of cases. « Screw or suture-button methods of stabilization are similar in results and outcome. » Optimal screw size, length, and position have not been fully elucidated. « Timing of weight-bearing is controversial. » Timing and option of fixation removal are controversial.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S232991851530162X; http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.n.00110; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2329918515301588; http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.n.00083; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84989235046&origin=inward; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84989259707&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490790; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490789; https://journals.lww.com/01874474-201510000-00001; http://Insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01874474-201510000-00003; http://Insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01874474-201510000-00004; https://journals.lww.com/01874474-201510000-00004; https://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.n.00110; https://journals.lww.com/jbjsreviews/Citation/2015/10000/Improving_Operating_Room_Efficiency,_Part_2_.4.aspx; https://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.n.00083; http://reviews.jbjs.org/cgi/doi/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00083; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01874474-201510000-00003; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01874474-201510000-00004; http://reviews.jbjs.org/cgi/doi/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00110
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know