Assessment of 3D acetabular offset in total hip arthroplasty using conventional reaming technique
Research Square
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Reconstruction of the hip center and appropriate offset is meaningful in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In our institution, THA is performed using the anterolateral supine (ALS) approach with intraoperative fluoroscopy, wherein the acetabulum is reamed using the conventional reaming technique. This study aimed to investigate and review 3D acetabular offset in ALS-THA and compare changes between the post-THA and the normal hips. Methods: Seventy-three patients with unilateral disease and 73 joints (mean age 62.8 years, all female patients) underwent ALS-THA using the conventional reaming technique with intraoperative fluoroscopy at the same institution. The acetabular medial offset (AMO), acetabular superior offset (ASO), and acetabular anterior offset (AAO, posterior +) were measured, and the amount of change in the unaffected hip joint and implanted hip joint was examined. Results: The mean AMO (±SD) in the normal hip was 33.8 mm (±1.6), the mean ASO (±SD) was 14.3 mm (±1.6), and the mean AAO (±SD) was 1.2 mm (±1.1). the mean AMO (±SD) in the implanted hip was 27.5 mm (±1.2), the mean ASO (±SD) was 16.8 mm (±1.8), and the AAO (±SD) was 3.7 mm (±0.9) in THA. There was a significant difference between the unaffected side and the post-THA offset in the AMO, ASO, and AAO groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.03 respectively). The difference in mean values between the normal side and the THA side was ΔAMO (±SD)6.3 mm (±1.9), ΔASO (±SD) 2.5 mm (±1.2), and ΔAAO (±SD) 2.4 mm (±1.0). Conclusion: 3D-CT was used to evaluate the acetabular offset by comparing the post-THA and normal hips after unilateral ALS-THA. Under fluoroscopic reaming, the center of rotation of the hip joint moved inward, upward, and backward.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know