Physiological measurements of passengers in self-driving cars encountering unexpected road events
Research Square
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In a preliminary analysis investigating the EEG and eye movement patterns of car passengers’ significant differences were reported in human driven and self-driving trials [15]. The differences suggested a preference and lower levels of anxiety in human driven conditions. The aim of the study reported here was to relate these differences to unexpected road events in real life passenger experience. These events were quick path corrections due to unforeseen obstacles on the path (deer and human shaped dummies). Every passenger went through both human and self-driving trials. The order of trials was balanced. Besides EEG and eye movements head movements and blinking frequencies were also recorded. Overall EEG and eye-tracking results were comparable to the preliminary findings showing the same overall differences between conditions. Analyses targeting the unexpected events showed moderate affective preferences for human drivers in the EEG data. Analyses of eye movements and head movements revealed larger multifractal spectrum differences for events vs smooth travel compared to human vs self-driving conditions. Blinking frequencies during the trip were lower during unexpected events, indicating higher levels of alertness.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know