Driving Factors of Citizen Science Change in Japan during COVID-19
Research Square
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Citizen science had been severely affected by COVID-19. However, changes of citizen science due to the pandemic in Asia and the driving factors underlying the changes have not been fully investigated. Based on a citizen science observation dataset for 8 cities of Japan from 2016 to 2021, we categorized the users into long-term and short-term users. The long-term users have higher observation number due to their persistent higher activity frequency. Then the changes of observation number were decomposed into user population effect, user structure effect, activity frequency effect, and observation intensity effect using the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) model for each city resepectively. The user population effect is the largest contributor to observation number changes in the cities for most years, with positive impacts before the pandemic and negative after the pandemic. The following effects are the observation intensity effect, activity frequency effect, and user structure effect. The findings suggest that, to recover citizen science from pandemic, the policymakers, practitioners, and researchers should consider the reasons underlying the changes in more detail.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know