Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) and Inclusion for promoting Workplace Creativity and Innovation: Systematic Review
Research Square
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Methodology: The study conducted a comprehensive review of research by analyzing 78 articles from reputable journals published between 2010 and 2023. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine how strategic human resource management (SHRM) and inclusion can promote workplace creativity and innovation among employees. Findings: The findings of the study indicate that inclusive SHRM practices should focus on various policies and practices across three main human resource practice domains: knowledge and abilities, drive and effort, and opportunities to contribute. Line managers play a crucial role in implementing inclusive SHRM practices to encourage workplace creativity and innovation. Integrating SHRM and inclusion strategies can harness the potential of diverse ideas and perspectives within the organization. Originality: The originality of the study lies in its comprehensive review of multiple articles and its focus on the integration of SHRM and inclusion strategies to promote creativity and innovation in the workplace. The study highlights the importance of HR managers, professionals, and line managers in implementing inclusive policies and practices to engage and empower the diverse workforce. It also suggests that future research should explore different aspects of SHRM's impact on organizational inclusion.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know