Characteristics of the fundus and optical coherence tomography angiography metrics in patients with myelinated retinal nerve fibers
Research Square
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
AIMS To investigate the fundus characteristics and macular OCTA metrics in patients with MRNFs and to identify the associations among myopic parameters, fundus metrics, and OCTA metrics METHODS The single-center case-control study included 15 patients with monocular MRNFs and 15 patients without MRNFs, matched for age, affected eyes’ spherical equivalent error (SER), and axial length (AL) between May 2021 and December 2021. Fundus features, including the entire MRNF area (Area1), the denser MRNF area (Area2), and the shortest distance from the fovea to the MRNF border (D), along with ocular parameters, including SER, AL, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and OCTA metrics at the fovea, including choroidal (ChT) and retinal (ReT) thicknesses at the fovea, the foveal avascular zone area (FAZ), foveal avascular zone perimeter (FAZP), FAZ-circularity index (FAZ-CI), and foveal vessel density in a 300-µm wide region (FD-300), were assessed. RESULTS The SER, AL, and CDVA were significantly worse and the ChT was thinner in the affected eyes than in the contralateral eyes. Compared with matched eyes, affected eyes had worse CDVA and thinner ReT. In the affected eyes, both Area1 and Area2 were negatively correlated with SER (r = -0.84, r = -0.65), ∆SER (r = -0.86, r = -0.61), ReT at the vertical superior 3 mm (VS) (r = -0.78, r = -0.67), and ChT_VS (r = -0.64, r = -0.62), and positively correlated with AL (r = 0.82, r = 0.52) and CDVA (r = 0.54, r = 0.59). D was negatively correlated with CDVA (r = -0.57). CONCLUSION The presence of MRNFs affects CDVA and ReT at the fovea. The area of the MRNFs, as well as the distance from the MRNFs to the fovea, are closely associated with the affected eyes’ CDVA, SER, AL, and the degree of anisometropia.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know