Optimization of uprooting efficiency of counter-rotating cotton stalk puller for on-field operations
Research Square
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background Cotton stalks, a by-product left after cotton picking, have several industrial applications as a raw material. However, due to deep taproot system, the uprooting and disposal of cotton stalks from the field is a labour-intensive operation. In this study, the uprooting efficiency of a counter-rotating drum type cotton stalk puller (CSP) was optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and combined Artificial Neural Network (ANN) - Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) approach. Machine operational parameters and design parameter were independent variables, whereas, uprooting efficiency, plants broken and plants left were response variables. Results An experimental CSP unit was operated in field at three forward speeds (1.37, 1.67 and 1.95 km/h), four drum speeds (250, 300, 350 and 400 rpm) and three drum inclinations (0, 10, 20). The optimization using RSM shown 332.5 rpm drum speed, 8.36 drum inclination and 1.37 km/h forward speed as optimal values. Plants uprooted, plants broken and plants left have optimum values of 96.6%, 2.8% and 1.1% with individual desirability of 0.97, 0.85 and 0.89 showing the closeness of responses to predicted values. ANN-PSO model shown optimal parameters as 1.37 km/h forward speed, 7.89 drum inclination and 331.45 rpm drum speed with the observed and predicted values of uprooting efficiency are 96.72% and 94.84%, respectively. Conclusion The results show that both RSM and combined ANN-PSO approach can better predict and optimize the performance of CSP with higher accuracy. Optimization study provide essential information on optimal combination of operating and design parameters for enhanced uprooting efficiency with minimum plant breakage.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know