Rational inattention as a transdiagnostic marker of mental disorders
Research Square
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
People tend to choose immediate payouts over larger payouts to be made in the future. This is called temporal discounting. Substantial research has indicated that steeper temporal discounting is associated with reduced self-control and various mental disorders, making it a plausible transdiagnostic marker of mental disorders. Recently, a novel theoretical framework and accompanying computational model has called into question the interpretation of temporal discounting as lack of self-control. Instead, this new framework suggests that temporal discounting is a function of uncertainty in cognitive representations of the future. This is an important distinction with regard to temporal discounting’s transdiagnostic standing because it means that reduced allocation of cognitive resources to representing future reward (rational inattention) is the transdiagnostic marker of mental disorders and not solely a lack of self-control. To test this possibility, here we compare the model of rational inattention to the classical hyperbolic model of intertemporal choice. We additionally evaluate the ability of rational inattention to predict a suite of psychopathological symptoms. We find that rational inattention does capture intertemporal choice better than the traditional model and that it correlates with dimensions of psychopathology. This work can inform cognitive-behavioral interventions of various mental disorders, as well as guide future research on intertemporal decision-making.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know