Personalized 3D-printed implant for thoracic vertebra body replacement after the total en bloc resection of a tumor with two-year follow up period
Research Square
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background This monocenter prospective study assessed the efficacy of 3D-printed personalized vertebral implants in reconstructing spinal stability following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for benign spinal tumors. Given the absence of specialized implants for post-resection reconstruction, this approach integrates 3D-printed implants for anatomical precision, stability, and improved postoperative outcomes. Methods Four patients who underwent TES and received customized 3D-printed vertebral implants were included. Data on surgical duration, blood loss, pain (VAS), and disability (ODI) were collected. Mechanical testing assessed implant durability, and follow-up evaluations were conducted over two years to monitor functional and neurological outcomes. Results The personalized implants demonstrated mechanical stability with no deformations at high loads. Post-surgical VAS and ODI scores showed significant improvements, reflecting reduced pain and enhanced functional outcomes. Neurological assessments indicated 75% of patients achieved full function recovery. CT imaging confirmed stable implant positioning, with no fixation failures or complications. Conclusions This study highlights the potential of 3D-printed implants for personalized spinal reconstruction, enhancing surgical planning and reducing procedure time and blood loss. Though promising, further research with larger cohorts is needed to establish long-term efficacy in various clinical settings.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know