Popvar: A genome-wide procedure for predicting genetic variance and correlated response in biparental breeding populations
Crop Science, ISSN: 1435-0653, Vol: 55, Issue: 5, Page: 2068-2077
2015
- 82Citations
- 132Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Predicting genetic variances of biparental populations has been a long-standing goal for plant breeders. The ability to discriminate among crosses with similarly predicted high means but different levels of genetic variance (V) should improve the effectiveness of breeding. We developed a procedure that uses established progeny simulation and genomic predictionstrategies to predict the population mean (µ) and V, the mean of the desired 10% of the progeny (superior progeny mean [µ ]), and correlated responses of multiple traits for biparental populations. The proposed procedure, PopVar, is herein demonstrated using a training population (TP) composed of 383 breeding lines that have been genotyped and phenotyped for yield and deoxynivalenol (DON). Marker effects estimated from the TP were used to calculate genotypic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of 200 simulated recombinant inbred lines (RILs) per cross. Values of µ, V, and µ were then calculated directly from the RIL GEBVs. We found that µ explaned 82 and 88% of variation in µ for yield and DON, respectively, and adding V to the regression model increased those respective R values to 99.5 and 99.6%. The results of correlated response revealed that although yield and DON are unfavorably correlated, the correlation was near zero or slightly negative in some simulated crosses, indicating the potential to increase yield while decreasing DON. This work extends the current benefits of genomic selection to include the ability to design crosses that maximize genetic variance with more favorable correlations among traits. PopVar is available as an R package that researchers and breeders are encouraged to use for empirical evaluation of the methodology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84939498650&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0030; https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0030; https://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0030; https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0030
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know