Unraveling the presence of multiple plagioclase populations and identification of representative two-dimensional sections using a statistical and numerical approach
American Mineralogist, ISSN: 1945-3027, Vol: 102, Issue: 9, Page: 1894-1905
2017
- 25Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Many plagioclase phenocrysts from volcanic and plutonic rocks display quite complex chemical and textural zoning patterns. Understanding the zoning patterns and variety of crystal populations holds clues to the processes and timescales that lead to the formation of the igneous rocks. However, in addition to a "true" natural complexity of the crystal population, the large variety of plagioclase types can be partly artifacts of the use of two-dimensional (2D) petrographic thin sections and random cuts of three-dimensional (3D) plagioclase crystals. Thus, the identification of the true number of plagioclase populations, and the decision of which are "representative" crystal sections to be used for detailed trace element and isotope analysis is not obvious and tends to be subjective. Here we approach this problem with a series of numerical simulations and statistical analyses of a variety of plagioclase crystals zoned in 3D. We analyze the effect of increasing complexity of zoning based on 2D chemical maps (e.g., backscattered electron images, BSE). We first analyze the random sections of single crystals, and then study the effect of mixing of different crystal populations in the samples. By quantifying the similarity of the compositional histogram of about a hundred 2D plagioclase sections it is possible to identify the so-called reference and ideal sections that are representative of the real 3D crystal populations. These section types allow filtering out the random-cut effects and explain more than 90% of the plagioclase compositional data of a given sample. Our method allows the identification of the main crystal populations and representative crystals that can then be used for a more robust interpretation of magmatic processes and timescales.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029378275&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am-2017-5929ccbyncnd; https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ammin/article/102/9/1894-1905/354030; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.2138/am-2017-5929CCBYNCND; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2138/am-2017-5929CCBYNCND/html; https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article/102/9/1894-1905/354030
Mineralogical Society of America
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know