Effectiveness of a 4x10 Surveillance Program to Detect and Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in a Public Primary School in a Marginalized Community of San Luis Potosi, Mexico
SSRN Electronic Journal
- 1Citations
- 844Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Mexican schools closed down in-person operations due to COVID-19 from March 2020 to February 2021. According to World Bank models, this implies a loss of 0.9 years of schooling. We set forth to design a COVID-19 safe return to school program specially adapted for both low national SARS-CoV-2 testing levels and a virtually non-existent school children vaccination scheme. Methods: The Community Program for a Safe Return encompassed five strategies: i) Community Surveillance (SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR testing of a community); ii) COVID-19 Education; iii) Hybrid Learning Strategy (dividing a classroom into two weekly-alternating groups of in-person schooling; iv) Layered Protection (health-status questionnaire, body-temperature control, mandatory facemasks, increased classroom ventilation, physical distancing and routine disinfection of classrooms) and; v) Virus Surveillance (weekly RT-qPCR testing of students and staff). Findings: A pilot program was implemented in a community of San Luis Potosí having a SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate below 5%. Negative SARS-CoV-2 test results were maintained in both children and staff throughout the study period. Interpretation Both WHO and CDC have emphasized the priority of in-person learning for students. Our program proved capable of providing a COVID-19 safe return to school and had an additional, unexpected, benefit of increasing community awareness and increased suspect-case surveillance. Such community involvement allowed for tailored adaptations of school attendance to be made, a strategy that proved to be both economically and epidemiologically feasible for resource limited settings. Funding: This study was supported by COPOCYT-CEEPAC/CTF/136/2020, FID 18397 Declaration of Interest: We declare no competing interests. Ethical Approval: Our study was reviewed and authorized by the State Health Ministry Committee of Bioethics (SLP/07/2020).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know