Descriptive Sensory Analysis, Consumer Preference, and Conjoint Analysis of Beef Sausages Prepared from a Pigeon Pea Protein Binder
SSRN Electronic Journal
- 1Citations
- 358Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The goal of this study was to assess the sensory profile, consumer acceptance, and internal and extrinsic factors influencing the acceptability of beef sausages made at varying levels of pigeon pea protein (2, 4, and 6% w/w) as a binder. Sausages prepared without binders (CNB) and sausages made with a chemical phosphate binder served as controls (PoB). A panel of 12 trained panelists performed descriptive analysis using the quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) approach on a 9-point line scale, while 70 consumers participated in a consumer test utilizing a 9-point hedonic scale. Preference mapping was done by linking descriptive sensory and hedonic data using partial least squares regression analysis (PLSR) and the conjoint analysis was conducted by 90 panelists using a 9-point scale. The 6% pea protein sausages had the significantly lowest (p<0.05) mean hardness, aroma, and color intensity but statistically similar (p>0.05) highest moistness intensity to the phosphate sausages. Phosphate sausages had the highest mean color and saltiness intensity (p<0.05) compared to the lowest mean values in 6% pea protein sausages. The phosphate sausages were the most accepted by consumers (p<0.05), followed by the 6% pea protein sausages, with aroma, saltiness, moistness, and firmness being the key drivers in consumer acceptability of sausages. Furthermore, formulation and price had a significant (p<0.05) effect on consumer acceptability. In conclusion, employing pea protein as a binder in sausage formulations improves sensory profiles and increases consumer acceptance, making it a possible food industry alternative. Further studies to determine the optimal amount of pea protein binder that will perform better than phosphate binder are recommended.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know