A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Increasing Human and Financial Resources for a Large PEPFAR Key Population HIV Program in Northeast Nigeria
SSRN Electronic Journal
2021
- 462Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Globally, Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest HIV burden. Although progress has been made towards achieving HIV epidemic control in this region, the progress has been uneven with minority HIV groups i.e., key populations (KPs), bearing a disproportionate burden of the epidemic. These micro-HIV epidemics will impact control gains if strategies are not implemented to prevent this. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the cost effectiveness of increasing human and financial resources for a key populations program. We utilized program level data covering a six-month period; a pre-intervention period (pre-surge) and intervention period (surge) and increased human and financial resources in line with an increased program target. The number of human resources (peer navigators) received a 3.4-fold increase, and the financial resources (budget) received a 2.5-fold increase in the surge period. We found that the number of KPs reached through our HIV services increased, and that for every $1000 spent during the surge period, 200 KPs were reached, 140 were of them we provided with HIV testing services and 16 new HIV-positive cases whereas for every $1000 spent during the pre-surge period, 71 KPs were reached, 25 of them were provided with HIV testing services and 3 new HIV-positive cases were identified. Significant funding investments, both at international and national levels is required in addition to existing prevention and treatment strategies to effectively mobilize and allocate resources for HIV/AIDS programs in order to successfully achieve epidemic control.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know