LGBT CEOs and stock returns: Diagnosing rainbow ceilings and cliffs
SSRN Electronic Journal
2022
- 2Citations
- 2,334Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study is the first to investigate the implications of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender chief executive officers (LGBT CEOs) for stock performance, using an exhaustive sample of 26 LGBT publicly listed company CEOs since 2000 to document statistically and economically significant financial outperformance of LGBT-led firms. Stocks of companies with openly LGBT CEOs generate a monthly alpha of 0.69%-1.08%, robust to portfolio weighting schemes, estimation frequency, multi-factor asset-pricing models, factor multicollinearity, sectoral allocation effects, and in subsamples both in the United States and globally. The results imply that a “rainbow ceiling” exists with regards to LGBT executives, and that firms they lead are persistently undervalued due to discrimination by investors. The rainbow ceiling effect is smaller for gay men CEOs than for CEOs with other LGBT identities. Further, LGBT CEOs on average represent small growth stocks with poor past performance, which supports the “rainbow cliff” hypothesis stating members of the LGBT community are overrepresented in precarious leadership positions. Portfolios formed of stocks with LGBT CEOs robustly outperform broad market indices in raw and risk-adjusted terms, evidencing potential attractiveness for ethical individual and institutional investment from both selfish and social perspectives.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know