Histolab: A Python Library for Reproducible Digital Pathology Preprocessing with Automated Testing
SSRN Electronic Journal
- 1Citations
- 491Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Deep Learning (DL) is rapidly permeating the field of Digital Pathology with algorithms successfully applied to ease daily clinical practice and to discover novel associations. However, most DL workflows for Digital Pathology include custom code for data preprocessing, usually tailored to data and tasks of interest, resulting in software that is error-prone and hard to understand, peer-review, and test. In this work, we introduce histolab, a Python package designed to standardize the preprocessing of Whole Slide Images in a reproducible environment, supported by automated testing. In addition, the package provides functions for building datasets of WSI tiles, including augmentation and morphological operators, a tile scoring framework, and stain normalization methods. histolab is modular, extensible, and easily integrable into DL pipelines, with support of the OpenSlide and large_image backends. To guarantee robustness, histolab embraces software engineering best practices such as multiplatform automated testing and Continuous Integration.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know