Corporate Conferences as a Coordination Mechanism: Evidence from Firm Performance, Innovation Disclosures, and Product Prices
SSRN Electronic Journal
2023
- 565Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We examine a topic of concern to antitrust regulators – anticompetitive behavior facilitated by joint conference participation with peers (i.e., horizontal conferencing). Theoretically, conferences, which are often organized by trade associations and investors, present opportunities for product market peers to repeatedly interact and may thus generate knowledge spillovers that may benefit firms and consumers but may also harm consumer welfare. Leveraging rich data for firms in the Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and Life Sciences industry, we use the distance from firms’ headquarters to the most frequent conference locations as an instrumental variable for horizontal conferencing. We find that consistent with anticompetitive behavior or the spread of knowledge externalities among peers via horizontal conferencing, participating firms exhibit better innovation productivity and operating profitability. We find that conference interactions are associated with increases in disclosures of competitively sensitive information, consistent with such interactions decreasing proprietary costs of disclosures and thus consistent with anticompetitive behavior’s dominance. In corroboration, the conference interactions are associated with increases in prescription drug prices. Overall, the evidence suggests horizontal conference participation benefits firms, and although stakeholders and consumers benefit through transparency and product improvements, respectively, consumer welfare suffers through more expensive products. Overall, although management benefits from conferencing with product market peers, our study is also informative to antitrust regulators, consumer watchdogs, and conference organizers who are concerned about anticompetitive behavior ensuing from conferences.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know