Classroom-Based Assessment (Cba) and Undergraduate Chinese Efl Learners’ Speaking Performance, Engagement, and Willingness to Communicate: Effects and Perceptions
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2023
- 151Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA) has emerged as a prominent pedagogical approach aimed at intertwining assessment within the instructional process, effectively fostering student learning. In English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education, CBA has garnered considerable attention, given its potential to enhance language learners' engagement, speaking proficiency, and willingness to communicate. This mixed-method research study delves into the impact of Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA) on the speaking performance, engagement, and willingness to communicate of undergraduate Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. The study involved 90 Chinese EFL learners in the quantitative phase and 25 in the qualitative phase. Data collection comprised three questionnaires and an interview checklist. The data analysis employed inferential statistics (t-tests) for the quantitative data and thematic analysis for the qualitative insights. The findings of this study reveal that CBA exerts a significant influence on language learners' engagement, speaking abilities, and willingness to communicate. The quantitative results, as indicated by t-tests, indicate noteworthy improvements in these key aspects when CBA is integrated into the classroom environment. Moreover, the qualitative phase of the study, employing thematic analysis, uncovered five distinct ways through which CBA impacts the main variables under investigation. This research elucidates the multifaceted influence of CBA on undergraduate Chinese EFL learners. It not only demonstrates the quantitative impact on engagement, speaking skills, and willingness to communicate but also offers valuable qualitative insights into the diverse ways through which CBA enhances the language learning experience. These findings underscore the significance of integrating CBA into EFL classrooms as a potent tool for optimizing learner outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know