Unraveling Graphite's Role in Nickel-Rich Lithium-Ion Batteries at a Large-Scale Cylindrical Cell Configuration: A Comparative Study of Artificial and Natural Graphite Electrode Performance
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2023
- 71Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study conducted a detailed evaluation of the electrochemical performance of artificial (AG) and natural graphite (NG) from four leading global companies: AG-1, AG-2, AG-3, and NG-4 towards Ni-rich Li-ion batteries. It found that AG-2, an artificial graphite variant, demonstrated superior performance with exceptional capacity, rapid charging capabilities, and impressive capacity retention. AG-2 achieved a specific capacity of 338.97 mAh/g, outperforming AG-1 (321.16 mAh/g), AG-3 (314.43 mAh/g), and NG-1 (328.08 mAh/g). This superiority was further confirmed by high C-rate tests ranging from 2C to 5C. Notably, after 500 cycles, AG-2 maintained 91.18% of its initial capacity, significantly surpassing AG-1 (89.44%), AG-3 (78.78%), and NG-1 (84.16%). The study attributes AG-2's exceptional performance to its refined properties such as smaller particle size, fewer graphite imperfections, and a higher 2H phase content. These characteristics lead to increased active material in the anode, enhancing battery capacity, and to less material degradation over time, ensuring consistent capacity retention. Overall, AG-2 stands out as a highly efficient and cost-effective option for lithium-ion battery applications, eclipsing other commercial graphite alternatives.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know