PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Traditional Knowledge as Intellectual Property Subject Matter: Perspectives from History, Anthropology, and Diverse Economies

SSRN Electronic Journal
2023
  • 0
    Citations
  • 1,669
    Usage
  • 4
    Captures
  • 3
    Mentions
  • 47
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Usage
    1,669
    • Abstract Views
      1,206
    • Downloads
      463
  • Captures
    4
  • Mentions
    3
    • News Mentions
      2
      • 2
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1
  • Social Media
    47
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      47
      • Facebook
        47
  • Ratings
    • Download Rank
      124,993

Most Recent News

Towards A Legalised International Instrument for Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resource

The text provides an overview of the upcoming diplomatic conference by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) regarding the potential creation of a legal instrument

Article Description

In May 2024, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the UN specialised agency for intellectual property, will hold a diplomatic conference with a view to forging a new legal instrument to prevent patents from misappropriating traditional knowledge and associated genetic resources. Thus, after more than 20 years of discussion at WIPO, there is a genuine possibility of a binding legal instrument providing substantive protection of traditional knowledge. Whatever actually transpires, that in itself is a matter of socio-legal and historical importance. Our aim is two fold. First, we enquire whether treating traditional knowledge (TK) as an intellectual property (IP) problem lending itself to an IP-related solution can actually work. In this context, we take account of the likelihood of any adopted international instrument taking the form of a one-size-fits-all text providing legal protection for knowledge deemed “traditional” on the basis of its originating from autochthonous or other groups sharing similar circumstances and related, albeit far from identical, legal and economic interests. By autochthonous, we refer to peoples so rooted psychologically, spiritually and materially to their homeland that it is if they were sprung from the land; their land. Second, we consider whether alternative framings of “the TK problem” in more pluralistic and culturally informed and culturally sensitive forms within or outside IP law may be more promising. IP law of course arises from a myriad of rationales situated within different timelines but embedded within a largely Eurocentric or American discourse and worldview that may be an ill fit for autochthonous and other groups who one presumably are to be the beneficiaries of the kinds of instrument under negotiation. The perspective we adopt invites a more intercultural and better informed discourse within law itself, which we feel is absolutely necessary. This perspective is then juxtaposed on the diverse economies approach which seeks to harness different practices in order to break down our dominant view of the world as being predominantly capitalist, at least in the sense of being based on waged labour, and production of commodities for exchange in markets run by capitalist businesses.By employing a multidisciplinary and pluralistic approach, we can better address the challenges facing Indigenous people and governments in the context of current and forthcoming international rules on the governance of TK.

Bibliographic Details

Graham Dutfield; Uma Suthersanen

Elsevier BV

Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Law and Society; Law and History

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know