Moving-Feature-Driven Label Propagation for Training Data Generation from Target Domains
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2024
- 153Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Deep learning models, due to their high sensitivity to training data distributions, may suffer from performance reduction when applied to construction sites different from the source domain where the training data originated. Although various technologies to improve the generalization capability of deep learning models, such as transfer learning, synthetic data generation, few-shot learning, and domain adaptation, collecting training data from a new target domain is generally inevitable to attain a desirable monitoring performance. To overcome the laborious processes of data re-collection and annotation from a new target domain, this paper presents a self-training strategy to generate training data for construction object detection. The proposed method produces target domain training data by: (1) employing optical flow estimation to detect moving objects from the target domain, (2) leveraging self-training to propagate existing labels to unlabeled data (moving objects), and (3) utilizing image inpainting and copy-paste augmentation to augment target domain-specific training data. Experimental results from four different scenes demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method in boosting the performance of object detectors within new target domains. The findings of this study will advance technologies of improving the generalization of deep learning models, thereby facilitating automated monitoring systems for the construction domain.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know