3-Party Covenant Financing Of ‘Semi-Regulated’ Pumped Hydro Assets
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2024
- 175Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
All credible scenarios of a decarbonising Australian power system with high levels of renewables rely on a portfolio of flexible, dispatchable storage and firming assets. Given our current understanding of costs and prices, such portfolios are thought to include short-duration batteries, intermediate-duration pumped hydro and gas turbines providing the last line of defence. The stochastic intermittency of wind, the synchronicity of rooftop and utility-scale solar PV, and stubbornly inelastic aggregate final demand serve to underscore this point. Wind and solar output need to be moved through space (networks) and time (storage). The storage asset class with the highest energy density, pumped hydro, appears to be facing structurally high capital costs with recent Australian estimates given via high profile projects under development (viz. Snowy 2.0, Borumba) being ~$6000/kW in real terms. Under-development will result in rising renewable curtailment rates and greater reliance on gas-fired generation. In this article, we focus on material reductions in the carrying cost of capital-intensive, ultra-long-lived pumped hydro assets through a semi-regulated, 3-Party Covenant (3PC) financing structure between governments, the consumer base and plant investors. When government bonds are included in 3PC financings, the post-arbitrage carrying costs can be reduced by almost 50%.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know