A Regression-based Parametric Model for Radiative Flux Density Distribution considering Shadowing and Blocking Effects
2024
- 121Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Paper Description
In solar power tower system, the Radiative Flux Density Distribution (RFDD) on the receiver surface reflected by a heliostat is influenced by various factors, referred to as scene parameters. The previous analytical models simplify the complex optical modeling process, thus neglecting the comprehensive impacts of the scene parameters, resulting in simulation errors. In this paper, a regression-based parametric model, namely Neural Elliptical Gaussian (NEG), is proposed to address this issue. The NEG model comprehensively considers the impacts of various scene parameters on the RFDD, including heliostat size, slant distance of heliostat, incident angle of sunlight, sunlight distribution parameter, slope error, etc. The relationship between the scene parameters and the RFDD is established using a neural network. Additionally, the overlooked shadowing and blocking effects in the conventional analytical models and data-driven methods are addressed by introducing the flux spot centroid offset in the NEG model. Since the NEG model is established based on statistical regression using a sampled and more accurate flux spot dataset, it shows more accurate flux spot prediction ability. Experimental results show that, for most scenarios, the root mean squared error is less than 0.35%, and the total energy error and peak value error are less than 5%.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know