Corporate Finance Through Loyalty Programs
2024
- 1Citations
- 690Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Paper Description
Loyalty programs (LPs) are widely prevalent and typically analyzed in economic research for their role in boosting business. This paper uncovers a novel role of LPs as financing instruments. The rewards issued to and redeemed by consumers cause shifts in firms’ present and future cash flows, effectively creating a form of borrowing from consumers. We document three stylized facts about LPs in the airline and hotel industries: 1) LPs serve as significant financing sources, with CCC programs contributing much and sales directly to consumers little; 2) rewards are issued through broad consumption but are redeemed predominantly for consumption related to the issuing firm; 3) LP financing helps smooth cash flows. We then build a dynamic model of LP financing. The model features convenient rewards that do not impose restrictions on redemption. Due to convenience, consumers would demand a lower discount rate, which creates gains from trades. But the funds raised through LPs emerge endogenously in equilibrium as a result of the interplay between reward issuance and redemption. The model suggests that 1) firms supplying high-value, low-frequency services can leverage LPs more effectively for financing; 2) LP financing helps smooth cash flows and is thus attractive to firms with highly volatile business; 3) firms should aim to decouple reward issuance from their business; 4) firms should limit consumers’ discretion to purchase or transfer rewards.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know