A meta-learning approach for user-defined spoken term classification with varying classes and examples
Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, ISSN: 1990-9772, Vol: 6, Page: 4071-4075
2021
- 3Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Recently we formulated a user-defined spoken term classification task as a few-shot learning task and tackled the task using Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) algorithm. Our results show that the meta-learning approach performs much better than conventional supervised learning and transfer learning in the task, especially with limited training data. In this paper, we extend our work by addressing a more practical problem in the user-defined scenario where users can define any number of spoken terms and provide any number of enrollment audio examples for each spoken term. From the perspective of fewshot learning, this is an N-way, K-shot problem with varying N and K. In our work, we relax the values of N and K of each meta-task during training instead of assigning fixed values to them, which differs from what most meta-learning algorithms do. We adopt a metric-based meta-learning algorithm named Prototypical Networks (ProtoNet) as it avoids exhaustive fine-tuning when N varies. Furthermore, we use the Max-Mahalanobis Center (MMC) loss as an effective regularizer to address the problem of ProtoNet under the condition of varying K. Experiments on the Google Speech Commands dataset demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms the conventional N-way, K-shot setting in most testing tasks.
Bibliographic Details
International Speech Communication Association
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know