Management of COPD in the UK primary-care setting: An analysis of real life prescribing patterns
International Journal of COPD, ISSN: 1178-2005, Vol: 9, Issue: 1, Page: 889-905
2014
- 238Citations
- 252Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations238
- Citation Indexes228
- 228
- CrossRef67
- Policy Citations8
- Policy Citation8
- Clinical Citations2
- PubMed Guidelines2
- Captures252
- Readers252
- 251
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Impact of switching from triple therapy to dual bronchodilation in COPD: the DACCORD ‘real world’ study
Abstract Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines recommend reserving triple therapy of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for
Article Description
Background: Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, evidence suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment is not always prescribed according to recommendations. This study evaluated the current management of patients with COPD using a large UK primary-care database. Methods: This analysis used electronic patient records and patient-completed questionnaires from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Data on current management were analyzed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group and presence or absence of a concomitant asthma diagnosis, in patients with a COPD diagnosis at ≥35 years of age and with spirometry results supportive of the COPD diagnosis. Results: A total of 24,957 patients were analyzed, of whom 13,557 (54.3%) had moderate airflow limitation (GOLD Stage 2 COPD). The proportion of patients not receiving pharmacologic treatment for COPD was 17.0% in the total COPD population and 17.7% in the GOLD Stage 2 subset. Approximately 50% of patients in both cohorts were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA; 26.7% for both cohorts) or a LABA and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA; 23.2% and 19.9%, respectively). ICS + LABA and ICS + LABA + LAMA were the most frequently used treatments in GOLD Groups A and B. Of patients without concomitant asthma, 53.7% of the total COPD population and 50.2% of the GOLD Stage 2 subset were receiving ICS. Of patients with GOLD Stage 2 COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year, 49% were prescribed ICS. A high proportion of GOLD Stage 2 COPD patients were symptomatic on their current management (36.6% with modified Medical Research Council score ≥2; 76.4% with COPD Assessment Test score ≥10). Conclusion: COPD is not treated according to GOLD and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in the UK primary-care setting. Some patients receive no treatment despite experiencing symptoms. Among those on treatment, most receive ICS irrespective of severity of airflow limitation, asthma diagnosis, and exacerbation history. Many patients on treatment continue to have symptoms.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84906868882&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/copd.s62750; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210450; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/727673334#eval793532758; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.727673334.793532758; http://www.dovepress.com/management-of-copd-in-the-uk-primary-care-setting-an-analysis-of-real--peer-reviewed-article-COPD; https://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=21363; https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/copd.s62750; https://www.dovepress.com/management-of-copd-in-the-uk-primary-care-setting-an-analysis-of-real--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPD; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25210450; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4154894; https://www.dovepress.com/management-of-copd-in-the-uk-primary-care-setting-an-analysis-of-real--peer-reviewed-article-COPD
Faculty Opinions Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know