The efficacy of low postoperative radiation dose in patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer without high-risk factors
Cancer Management and Research, ISSN: 1179-1322, Vol: 12, Page: 7553-7560
2020
- 1Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of low postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) dose in patients with advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) and identify prognostic factors in this group. Patients and Methods: Between January 2013 and September 2015, 110 consecutive patients with HPSCC with no high-risk factors were treated postoperatively to 50 Gy (n=89), 56 Gy (n=12), and 60 Gy (n=9) in 2 Gy/fraction. Overall survival (OS), 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), 3-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed. Results: Median follow-up time was 40 months (range=6–75 months). The 3-year local-regional control (LRC) and 3-year neck control rate were 86.3% and 91.8%, respectively. The 3-year OS, PFS, and LRFS were 69.9%, 65.5%, and 80.5%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, T stage showed a significant correlation with improved OS, PFS, and LRFS (P=0.008, P=0.039, P=0.034). On multivariate analysis, T stage showed a significant correlation with improved OS and PFS. N stage showed a significant correlation with improved PFS. However, interval surgery-radiotherapy, reconstructive methods, and RT dose cannot serve as a significant prognostic factor for survival outcome. Conclusion: This study suggests that treating no high-risk factors for locally advanced HPSCC with a dose of 50 Gy to the whole operative bed and elective lymph node levels cannot compromise disease control and survival.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089690434&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s249725; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32943918; https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-low-postoperative-radiation-dose-in-patients-with-adva-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR; https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s249725; https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-low-postoperative-radiation-dose-in-patients-with-adva-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CMAR
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know