Effective analysis of inpatient satisfaction: The random forest algorithm
Patient Preference and Adherence, ISSN: 1177-889X, Vol: 15, Page: 691-703
2021
- 12Citations
- 72Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- Captures72
- Readers72
- 72
Article Description
Purpose: To identify the factors influencing inpatient satisfaction by fitting the optimal discriminant model. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional survey of inpatient satisfaction was conducted with 3888 patients in 16 large public hospitals in Zhejiang Province. Independent variables were screened by single-factor analysis, and the importance of all variables was comprehensively evaluated. The relationship between patients’ overall satisfaction and influencing factors was established, the relative risk was evaluated by marginal benefit, and the optimal model was fitted using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Patients’ overall satisfaction was 79.73%. The five most influential factors on inpatient satisfaction, in this order, were: patients’ right to know, timely nursing response, satisfaction with medical staff service, integrity of medical staff, and accuracy of diagnosis. The prediction accuracy of the random forest model was higher than that of the multiple logistic regression and naive Bayesian models. Conclusion: Inpatient satisfaction is related to healthcare quality, diagnosis, and treatment process. Rapid identification and active improvement of the factors affecting patient satisfaction can reduce public hospital operating costs and improve patient experiences and the efficiency of health resource allocation. Public hospitals should strengthen the exchange of medical information between doctors and patients, shorten waiting time, and improve the level of medical technology, service attitude, and transparency of information disclosure.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104595014&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s294402; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33854303; https://www.dovepress.com/effective-analysis-of-inpatient-satisfaction-the-random-forest-algorit-peer-reviewed-article-PPA; https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s294402; https://www.dovepress.com/effective-analysis-of-inpatient-satisfaction-the-random-forest-algorit-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPA
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know