Interventions for the prevention of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis current status
CNS Drugs, ISSN: 1172-7047, Vol: 17, Issue: 8, Page: 563-575
2003
- 17Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef10
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Review Description
The assessment of brain volume changes on serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can provide an objective measure of the neurodegenerative component of multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology. Results from placebo-controlled and crossover clinical trials indicate that immunomodulating (e.g. recombinant interferon-β [IFNβ]-1a [Rebif®] and IFNβ-1b [Betaferon®] and glatiramer acetate [Copaxone®]) and immunosuppressive (e.g. cladribine and alemtuzumab) treatments for relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive MS lack substantial efficacy in preventing the development of brain atrophy, despite the marked effects of these treatments on clinical and MRI outcomes of disease activity. A modest but significant treatment effect on brain atrophy has been reported for patients with RRMS only in one trial of IFNβ-1a (Avonex®) and in another study of long-term corticosteroid therapy. Failure to find a significant treatment benefit in preventing brain atrophy might be the result of inadequate trial designs, including their relatively short durations, which may not be adequate to reveal beneficial effects in a chronic disease like MS. Alternatively, such a failure might indicate that treatments proven to be effective in reducing MS-related inflammation are unable to act with the same efficacy on the most severe and disabling pathological substrates of the disease. The modest correlation between MRI enhancement frequency and brain atrophy observed in the placebo groups of several trials also fits with the concept that the suppression of inflammatory activity in MS is not fully and rapidly associated with a similar effect on the global neurodegenerative process of the disease.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037757982&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200317080-00002; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12775193; http://link.springer.com/10.2165/00023210-200317080-00002; https://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200317080-00002; https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00023210-200317080-00002
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know