Daily water quality evaluation of reservoir and cyanobacteria pollution index calculation
Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, ISSN: 1607-0798, Vol: 21, Issue: 2, Page: 836-847
2021
- 3Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Water quality evaluation is the most direct and quantitative description of a reservoir water environment. Due to the lack of biological factor evaluation in water quality evaluation at present, the conventional pollution index evaluation system was used to evaluate water quality and the correlation between the evaluation indexes and the concentration of cyanobacteria was studied. After determining the correlation, a novel calculation method using the cyanobacteria pollution index was determined by principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that the eutrophication index and nitrogen phosphorus index of the water body were high. Biological pollution in reservoirs cannot be ignored. The correlation between eutrophication index and cyanobacteria concentration was weak (Pearson correlation ¼ 0.242). For the reservoir, it was necessary to establish a special cyanobacteria pollution index. Five variables were used for the cyanobacteria pollution index calculation by the PCA method. The total variance of the two main components was 77.107%, which reflected most of the data information. In the reservoirs of other areas, similar parameters can also be selected to calculate the cyanobacteria pollution index. This research provides a reference for the biological factor evaluation of similar reservoirs in the world.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103613956&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.350; https://iwaponline.com/ws/article/21/2/836/78539/Daily-water-quality-evaluation-of-reservoir-and; http://iwaponline.com/ws/article-pdf/21/2/836/926120/ws021020836.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.350
IWA Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know