Heterogeneous Gene Expression Cross-evaluation of Robust Biomarkers Using Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Lung Cancer
Current Bioinformatics, ISSN: 2212-392X, Vol: 17, Issue: 2, Page: 150-163
2022
- 2Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Nowadays, gene expression analysis is one of the most promising pillars for understanding and uncovering the mechanisms underlying the development and spread of cancer. In this sense, Next Generation Sequencing technologies, such as RNA-Seq, are currently leading the market due to their precision and cost. Nevertheless, there is still an enormous amount of non-analyzed data obtained from older technologies, such as Microarray, which could still be useful to extract relevant knowledge. Methods: Throughout this research, a complete machine learning methodology to cross-evaluate the compatibility between both RNA-Seq and Microarray sequencing technologies is described and imple-mented. In order to show a real application of the designed pipeline, a lung cancer case study is ad-dressed by considering two detected subtypes: adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Tran-scriptomic datasets considered for our study have been obtained from the public repositories NCBI/GEO, ArrayExpress and GDC-Portal. From them, several gene experiments have been carried out with the aim of finding gene signatures for these lung cancer subtypes, linked to both transcriptomic technologies. With these DEGs selected, intelligent predictive models capable of classifying new samples belonging to these cancer subtypes have been developed. Results: The predictive models built using one technology are capable of discerning samples from a dif-ferent technology. The classification results are evaluated in terms of accuracy, F1-score and ROC curves along with AUC. Finally, the biological information of the gene sets obtained and their relation-ship with lung cancer are reviewed, encountering strong biological evidence linking them to the disease. Conclusion: Our method has the capability of finding strong gene signatures which are also independent of the transcriptomic technology used to develop the analysis. In addition, our article highlights the potential of using heterogeneous transcriptomic data to increase the amount of samples for the studies, increasing the statistical significance of the results.
Bibliographic Details
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know