A Tagging SNP Set Method Based on Network Community Partition of Linkage Disequilibrium and Node Centrality
Current Bioinformatics, ISSN: 2212-392X, Vol: 17, Issue: 9, Page: 825-834
2022
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Aims: Solving the tagSNP selection problem by network method and reconstructing unknown individual from tagSNPs by a prediction method. Background: As a genetic marker, SNP has been used for linkage analysis of genetic diseases in ge-nome-wide association studies. The genetic information carried by SNPs is redundant in regions of high linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Therefore, a subset of informative SNPs (tagSNP set) is sufficient to represent the rest of the SNPs, reducing the genotyping cost and computational complexity greatly. Methods: A novel tagSNP set selection method named NCCRT is proposed, which combines the ideas of the network community partition of the SNP network and node centrality ranking to select tagSNPs of genotype data. Results: The method is tested on three data sets, including 176 SNPs, 169 SNPs, and 56 SNPs of gene ASAH1, HTR2A, and OLFM4. The experimental results show that our method achieves the best effect in terms of prediction accuracy and stability for ASAH1 and HTR2A. Conclusion: Compared with random sampling, greedy algorithm, and TSMI algorithm, our method does not rely on causal SNP selection, but it can also quickly identify the tagSNP nodes and improve the prediction accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know