Transaction scheduling heuristics in mobile distributed real time database system
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, ISSN: 2666-2566, Vol: 13, Issue: 4, Page: 758-770
2020
- 4Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Today's widely used small and portable mobile database technologies have geared toward the mobile distributed real-time database systems (MDRTDBS).Various real time applications like mobile devices, missile systems, navigation control systems, satellites and many others are some examples of MDRTDBS. In the new era of technology, a large domain of applications are based on MDRTDBS, meanwhile different intrinsic limitation like disconnection and mobility typically effect on its correct execution. Mobile distributed real-time systems have different wireless constrained such like energy, processing capacity, memory storage facilities and variable network communication channels. In last few years, different applications run on different mobile nodes needed a suitable transaction mechanism to complete their service without failing its deadline. In recent years researchers focused on MDRTDBS, to develop a suitable concurrency control, commit control method. Replication, check pointing, security, caching and query processing are some other hot research topics in the field of MDRTDBS. Objective: it is needed to maintain data consistency and correct results in mobile distributed real time database system. In our review we have identified key issues which might be considered for development of various transaction executing protocols. We have Introduce a taxonomy of different CC, commit, replication and security issues, which could be advantageous for design, and development of transaction protocols. Method: In the review we have discussed various concurrency, commit, replication methods. Apart from these we have discussed various check pointing, caching and query techniques which is developed in database system. A comparison among various concurrency and commit protocols has been done in the review. The role of different key methods which can affect and help the transaction execution in wireless environment is discussed separately in the paper. Results: Analytical results are not mentioned in the review paper. However the role and affect on the transaction execution are mentioned clearly. Issues and their advantages of different concurrency and commit protocols are mentioned. Conclusion: It is found that transaction processing is still a challenging area of research. A number of issues has been discussed and reviewed various approaches to control concurrency control and atomicity methods. We have presented a detailed survey and classification of various issues based on commit, concurrency, and replication methods for MTDRTDBS. However, in the paper different security, caching and query processing and check pointing issues has been also discussed which should be considered for future work. Database researchers have needed to integrate these issues with their work and develop a suitable protocol.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078796102&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2213275912666190809120654; https://www.eurekaselect.com/174233/article; https://eurekaselect.com/article/download/174233; https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2213275912666190809120654; https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/100254
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know