Privacy, security, and usability of mobile video conferencing applications: A comparative study
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, ISSN: 2313-3724, Vol: 10, Issue: 11, Page: 109-116
2023
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Mobile learning tools have facilitated authentic learning experiences, allowing students to forge meaningful connections while acquiring real-world knowledge. Mastering the skill of using mobile video conferencing applications is crucial but often complicated for users, such as students, teachers, and employers. In this study, the mobile video conferencing applications Zoom and Webex were compared with respect to their usability, using cognitive load theory as the conceptual framework. A systematic mapping approach was applied to obtain comparative descriptive information from surveyed literature. The available literature on communications support, accessibility and usability, and privacy and security of video conferencing technology was used for the systematic mapping process. The literature review revealed that Zoom and Webex usage can lead to cognitive fatigue, so users must avoid multitasking and schedule breaks between sessions to remain focused. Furthermore, video conferencing tools need to bridge the gap between usability and security for augmented safety of personal information alongside user comfort. Overall, the findings of this study are important for reducing the complexities of mobile video conferencing applications and enhancing the mobile learning experience.
Bibliographic Details
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know