G20 α-stable portfolios: Empirical evidence with Markowitz, Tobin and CAPM
Revista Mexicana de Economia y Finanzas Nueva Epoca, ISSN: 2448-6795, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 1-28
2021
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: This research extends Markowitz, Tobin, and CAPM optimal portafolio with α-stable processes. Methodology: The following procedures are performed on a portfolio with the G20 stock indices: 1) descriptive statistics and α-stable parameters of index returns are estimated, 2) a goodness-of-fit test is applied to validate the α- stable processes, 3) the covariation matrix is estimated to calculate the optimal portfolio assignments, and 4) the systematic risk indicators are estimated. Results: The efficient frontier is calculated without short sales and shows that α-stable portfolios present greater aversion to risk than Gaussian portfolios, and that α-stable portfolios are more efficient with respect to the return and risk ratio. Recommendations: The application of α-stable processes to model leptokurtosis, asymmetry and volatility clusters. Limitations: The α-stable multivariate analysis presents different stability parameters. Originality: G20 returns are modeled with α-stable processes and a sensitivity analysis is performed. Conclusion: α-stable analysis allows to quantify market risk more adequately than Gaussian analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151155064&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.21919/remef.v16i4.533; https://www.remef.org.mx/index.php/remef/article/view/533; https://www.remef.org.mx/index.php/remef/article/download/533/769; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-53462021000400009&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1665-53462021000400009&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-53462021000400009; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1665-53462021000400009; https://dx.doi.org/10.21919/remef.v16i4.533
Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, A.C. (IMEF)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know