Gender- Based Variation in Stress, Coping Strategies and Emotional Wellbeing among Academic Staff in Public Saudi Universities
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research, ISSN: 2345-363X, Vol: 35, Issue: 1
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
This study aims to explore gender differences in occupational stress sources, coping strategies, and emotional well-being among academic staff in Saudi public universities. The leading theory of transactional stress and coping implies the impact of stress and coping strategies on the health and well-being of people. The study surveyed 475 academic staff, 340 females and 137 males employed in Saudi public universities. They were invited to participate in the study by responding to the questionnaire. The study's significant findings reveal distinct variations in occupational stress levels between male and female academic staff. Additionally, it highlights gender-based differences in coping strategies employed by academic staff. Furthermore, the study identifies a prevalent issue of suboptimal levels of emotional well-being among academic staff at public universities in Saudi Arabia. These findings underscore the importance of addressing gender-specific stressors and promoting strategies for enhancing emotional well-being within the academic environment. The presented results consider relevant research, and the practical implications indicate that when Saudi-based universities implement policies and support systems for their staff members, they should consider the gender-based differences emphasized in this study. This could involve providing targeted support programs and policies to address the specific stressors that male and female academics face. Also, encouraging open communication, promoting work-life balance, and fostering a culture of well-being can contribute to creating a more inclusive and supportive academic environment for all faculty members.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know