PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Wear Properties of Al/MoS2 Nanocomposite Coatings Generated by ElectroSpark Deposition on the Surface of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy

Iranian Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, ISSN: 2383-3882, Vol: 19, Issue: 3, Page: 1-20
2022
  • 0
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 3
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

This study investigates the effect of Al/MoS2 nanocomposite coating by the electro spark deposition (ESD) method on the surface properties of the substrate. Ti-6Al-4V alloy sheet containing 6.12% Al, 4.06% V, 0.19% Fe, and 0.05% Ni was used as substrate in this study. For coating, an aluminum-molybdenum disulfide composite electrode in the form of a cylindrical rod was employed. Three frequencies of 5, 8, and 11 kHz, three current limits of 15, 25, and 35 amps, and three duty cycles of 50, 60, and 70% were used in the coating operation. AFM analysis was used to study the topography, morphology, and to calculate roughness. The samples were then subjected to hardness tests. To determine the wear resistance of the samples, pin on disk tests were performed. XRD analysis was performed to identify the phases on the surface of the coated samples. SEM was used to examine the microstructure of the coating before and after wear testing, in order to determine the wear mechanism. The results indicated that the Al/MoS2 nanocomposite coating was formed on the substrate surface. The hardness of the reference sample was 353 Vickers, and that of the coated sample was about 200 Vickers. For the reference sample, the roughness was measured at 15.7 nm, and for the coated sample at 268.1 nm. As spark energy increased, the coefficient of friction increased by approximately 0.09. As spark energy increased, the wear rate increased by 27%. A significant increase in the Lancaster coefficient occurred around 5 joules of energy. According to the wear rate results, the sample with the lowest thickness wears 4% less than the sample with the highest thickness. The wear rate of sample 351170 is 78% lower than that of sample 150550.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know