Discretionary fiscal policy in Brazil, 1995-2017: Decomposition and evolution
Investigacion Economica, ISSN: 2594-2360, Vol: 79, Issue: 313, Page: 51-77
2020
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article aims to evaluate the general (expansionist or contractionist) orientation of the discretionary component of Brazilian fiscal policy in the period 1995-2017, as well as to verify its position in relation to the economic cycle (procyclical or anticyclical). To this end, it proposes and applies a new methodology to separate the discretionary fiscal impulse from the part of the fiscal result arising from the operation of automatic fiscal stabilizers. It concludes that fiscal policy: 1) generated a mostly procyclical (destabilizing) position of its discretionary component, leading it to amplify rather than dampen economic cycles; 2) failed to prevent the public debt gdp ratio from entering the unsustainable path at the end of the period. Suggestions are made to improve its performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120036190&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76065; http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rie/article/view/76065; http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rie/article/viewFile/76065/67150; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-16672020000300051&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0185-16672020000300051&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-16672020000300051; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0185-16672020000300051; https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76065
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know